中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)典型案例

內(nèi)容概要

本書選取中國(guó)最高人民法院及地方法院共26個(gè)近年來(lái)較為典型的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案例進(jìn)行編譯，提煉案情，總結(jié)裁判要旨，并進(jìn)行相關(guān)法理評(píng)析。全書分為兩編，第一編15個(gè)案例由判決原文的中、英文編譯稿組成；第二編11個(gè)案例主要對(duì)判決進(jìn)行英文編譯，而判決原文作為附錄，以便展示法院判決的要點(diǎn)和相關(guān)法律的適用全貌。
 讀者對(duì)象：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的科研人員和實(shí)務(wù)工作者，以及普通大眾。

作者簡(jiǎn)介

編者：鄭勝利 (意大利)瑪麗娜·提莫泰歐 龔紅兵

書籍目錄

Part 1
　Case l Strix Limited(UN)v．Ningbo Shenglida Electric Manufacturin9
C0Ltd and Huapu Hypermarket C0Ltd，on patent infringement
　Case 2 Zhejiang Hangzhou Xinfu Pharmaceutical C0Ltd
V．Shandong Xinfa Pharmaceutical C0Ltd and Shanghai ACT Int．C0Ltd on
retrial of dispute concerning royalties for temporary protection
for patent for invention and opposition to the j urisdiction of
patent infringement
　Case 3 Jining Pressureless Boiler Factory v．Patent
Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office and
Shu Xuezhang(the third party)，on retrial of dispute of invalidation
of patent for invention
　Case 4 Zhang Jianhua v．Shenyang Zhilian Gaoceng Gongnuan Jis．huC0
Ltd．on patent infringement of utility model
　Case 5 Shen Qiheng v．Shanghai Shengmao Transport
Infrastructure Project C0Ltd，on patent infringement dispute of
utility
　Case 6 Hua Jiping and Hefei Andihua Import and Export C0．Ltd V
Shanghai Sportin Trading C0Ltd，F(xiàn)engli Machinery Factory Co Ltd of
Rudong County and Nantong Tianlong Plasnc Industry C0Ltd。on dispute
of patent infringement
　Case 7 Guangdong Senses Culture Communication C0Ltd
v．Hon9
Rudin9，Han Wei，Guangzhou Audio&Video Publishin9 House，Chongqing
Sanxia。Disc Development C0Ltd，and Liansheng Commerce Chain
C0Ltd，on．retri al of copyright infringement
　Case 8 China Federation of Literary and Art Circles Publishing
Cofporanon，Tianjin Tianbao Culture Developing Corporation，and
Tianjin Tianbao CD Corporation v．Guangdong Changj in Visual and
Sound Products Corporation，Hebei Province Hebei Bangzi Opera
Theater etc0n dispute over copyright
　……
Part 2

章節(jié)摘錄

版權(quán)頁(yè)：The Court of first instance deems that the allegedly infringing product has three regressiontechnical features and one equivalent technical feature as compared to the patent in suit,making it inferior to the patent technology of Zhilian Company. So the technology whichGaolian Company holds, as a regression technology, infringes the Zhilian Company'sexclusive patent right of exploitation. According to the patent description, the water circuit breaker has a complicatedbreathing apparatus that can inhale and exhale regularly when the system is unstable, inorder to maintain the normal pressure in the system. The system adopts water sealtechnology. The buffer device of Gaolian Company, however, has a check exhaust valvethat is only able to perform exhalation but riot inhalation. As a result, the system cannotrun when it is unstable, especially when the pre:ssure in the buffer device is below the atmospheric pressure. The check exhaust valve of Gaolian Company, compared with the breathing apparatus of the patented water circuit breaker Zhilian Company holds, is aregression technology that can be achieved by any technician skilled in HVAC areas byreading the description without any creative work.   There is a threaded guide plate in the water circuit breaker of Zhilian Company, which ismade for water-gas separation by turning the water in the water circuit breaker intomembrane flow. Though the buffer device of Gaolian Company applies the membrane flowprinciple too, it does not have the threaded guide plate that reinforces the decompressionand deceleration effect. So the buffer device of Gaolian Company is not as good as the patented technology of water circuit breaker of Zhilian Company, thus becomes an otherregression technical feature.

編輯推薦

《中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)典型案例(英漢雙語(yǔ))》是由知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)出版社出版的。

圖書封面

評(píng)論、評(píng)分、閱讀與下載

---

    中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)典型案例 PDF格式下載

---