中國學習者習得英語非賓格動詞的新實證研究/外語語言文學博士論叢

內(nèi)容概要

　　《中國學習者習得英語非賓格動詞的新實證研究》在研究對象上，選用了四組不同水平的中國學習者做橫向比較。在研究內(nèi)容上，不僅考察多種和非賓格動詞有關(guān)的中介語錯誤，還把非作格動詞納入研究范圍。在研究方法上，綜合使用了控制性書面產(chǎn)出任務(wù)、可接受性判斷任務(wù)、后續(xù)訪談、英語教材語料庫檢索等多種研究工具，不僅分析了動詞的小組結(jié)果，還分析了動詞的個體結(jié)果。獲得了三大發(fā)現(xiàn)。第一，中國英語學習者從很低水平開始就可以區(qū)分英語非賓格動詞和非作格動詞。第二，他們對可轉(zhuǎn)換和不可轉(zhuǎn)換的非賓格動詞之間的區(qū)別是逐步掌握的，學習過程中往往會犯一些混淆它們之間區(qū)別的錯誤。第三，在他們習得英語非賓格動詞的過程中，存在詞與詞之間的差異，有的動詞學生學得快，有的學得慢。他的這些發(fā)現(xiàn)支持了“非賓格層級假設(shè)”和部分支持了基于規(guī)則的可轉(zhuǎn)換非賓格動詞的習得理論，但不支持“非賓格陷阱假設(shè)”。除此之外，這些發(fā)現(xiàn)還表明漢語在中國學習者習得英語非賓格動詞的過程中發(fā)生部分遷移，同時，二語輸入的頻次在該類動詞習得過程中也發(fā)揮了重要作用。

書籍目錄

Introduction0.1 Motivations for the Study0.1.1 Unaccusative verbs as a difficult area for L2 learners0.1.2 L2 acquisition of unaccusative verbs as an enduring hot topic for L2 research0.1.3 Wide disparities between studies in and outside China0.2 Significance of the Study0.2.1 Theoretical significance0.2.2 Pedagogical significance0.2.3 Methodological significance0.3 Overview of the MonographPart I Literature ReviewChapter One: Theoretical Background1.1 Overview1.2 Framework of Analysis1.3 The Unaccusative Hypothesis1.4 The Unaccusative Trap Hypothesis1.4.1 Foundations1.4.2 Contents1.4.3 Predictions1.5 The Unaccusative Hierarchy Hypothesis1.6 The rulebased theory of learning ahemating unaccusativ1.7 SummaryChapter Two: English and Chinese Unaecusative Verbs2.1 Overview2.2 English Unaccusative Verbs2.2.1 Subclasses of English unaccusative verbs2.2.2 Diagnostic constructions for English unaccusative verbs2.3 Chinese Unaccusative Verbs2.3.1 Surface unaccusativity and definiteness effect2.3.2 Existential sentences as diagnostics for Chinese unaccusative verbs2.3.3 Subclasses of Chinese unaccusative verbs2.4 Comparison between English and Chinese Unaccusative Verbs2.4.1 Similarities between English and Chinese unaccusative verbs2.4.2 Differences between English and Chinese unaccusative2.4.3 Possible effects on Chinese learners acquisition of English unaccusative verbs2.5 SummaryChapter Three: Previous Studies of L2 Acquisition of English Unaccusative Verbs3.1 Overview3.2 Previous Studies outside China3.2.1 Zobl （1989）3.2.2 Yip （1995）3.2.3 Oshita （1997）3.2.4 Hwang （1999）3.2.5 Hirakawa （2000）3.2.6 Ju （2000）3.2.7 Deguehi and Oshita （2003）3.2.8 Summary of the previous studies outside China3.3 Previous Studies in China3.3.1 Y. Cai （1998）3.3.2 J.T. Cai （2000）3.3.3 Yu （2002）3.3.4 J.T. Cai （2005）3.3.5 Summary of the previous studies in China3.4 Major Issues Investigated in the Previous Studies3.4.1 Unaccusatives versus unergatives3.4.2 Nonahemating versus alternating unaccusatives3.4.3 Betweenverb variations among unaccusatives3.5 Unsolved Issues and Weaknesses in the Previous Studies3.6 Attempts Made in the Present Study3.7 SummaryPart II MethodologyChapter Four: Research Design4.1 Overview4.2 Research Questions4.3 Participants4.4 Target Words4.5 Instruments4.5.1 Written production task4.5.2 Acceptability judgment task4.5.3 Interviews4.5.4 Textbook corpus survey4.6 Data Collection4.6.1 Collection of written production and acceptability judgment data4.6.2 Collection of interview data4.6.3 Collection of textbook corpus data4.7 Data Analysis4.7.1 Analysis of written production data4.7.2 Scoring of acceptability judgment data4.7.3 Transcription of interview data4.7.4 Analysis of textbook corpus data4.7.5 Principle of analyzing betweenverb variations4.7.6 Statistical tools4.8 SummaryPart III Results and DiscussionChapter Five: Unaccusatives versus Unergatives5.1 Overview5.2 Results5.2.1 Results of passivization5.2.2 Results of avoidance5.2.3 Results of the postverbal NP structures5.2.4 Results of causativization5.3 DiscussionChapter Six: Nonalternating versus Alternating Unaccusatives6.1 Overview6.2 Acquisition Sequence6.2.1 Sequence in avoidance6.2.2 Sequence in passivization6.2.3 Summary of avoidance and passivization6.3 Acquisition Problems6.3.1 Nonalternating unaccusatives6.3.2 Alternating unaccusatives6.3.3 Comparison between nonalternating and alternating unaccusatives6.4 Developmental Patterns6.4.1 Nonalternating unaccusatives6.4.2 Alternating unaccusatives6.4.3 Comparison between nonalternating and alternating unaccusatives6. 5 DiscussionChapter Seven: Betweenverb Variations among Unaccusatives7.1 Overview7.2 Betweenverb Variations among Nonalternating Unaccusatives7.2.1 Written production results7.2.2 Acceptability judgment results7.3.3 Summary of written production and acceptability judgment results7.2.4 Contributing factors7.3 Betweenverb Variations among Alternating Unaccusatives7.3.1 Written production results7.3.2 Acceptability judgment results7.3.3 Summary of written production and acceptability judgment results7.3.4 Contributing factors7.4 Discussion7.4.1 Partly supporting the rulebased theory of learning alternating unaccusatives7.4.2 Detecting the selective transfer of L17.4.3 Unveiling the important role of L2 inputPart IV ConclusionChapter Eight: Conclusion8.1 Overview8.2 Major Findings8.3 Implications8.3.1 Theoretical implications8.3.2 Pedagogical implications8.3.3 Methodological implications8.4 Limitations8.5 Suggestions for Future StudiesReferencesAppendicesAppendix IAppendix II

圖書封面

評論、評分、閱讀與下載

---

    中國學習者習得英語非賓格動詞的新實證研究/外語語言文學博士論叢 PDF格式下載

---