出版時(shí)間:2000-12 出版社:上海外語教育出版社 作者:(意)伯以塔尼 頁數(shù):262
Tag標(biāo)簽:無
內(nèi)容概要
本書是“劍橋文學(xué)指南”叢書中的一本,由一組既獨(dú)立成篇又互為參照的論文構(gòu)成,撰稿者均為國際知名的喬叟專家。論文大致可以分為兩大類別;一類著眼一首或多首喬叟的主要詩作,探討其主題,風(fēng)格;另一類則從更廣闊的視野著手,追溯其創(chuàng)作的文學(xué)淵源、歷史背景、風(fēng)格與結(jié)構(gòu)的
書籍目錄
"List of contributors
Preface
Note on the text
1 The social and literary scene in England
2 Chaucers Continental inheritance: The early poems and Troilus and Criseyde
3 Old books brought to life in dreams: The Book of the Duchess, the House of Fame, The Parliament of Fowls
4 Telling the story in Troilus and Criseyde
5 Chance and destiny in Troilus and Criseyde and the Knights Tale
6 The Canterbury Tales I: Romance
7 The Canterbury Tales II: Comedy
8 The Canterbury Tales III: Pathos
9 The Canterbury Tales IV: Exemplum and fable
11 Literary structures in Chaucer
13 Chaucers narrator: Troilus and Criseyde and the Canterbury
14 Chaucers poetic style
15 Further reading: A guide to Chaucer studies
Index"
章節(jié)摘錄
It is important at this stage to introduce a distinction between the Friar'sand Summoner's tales and the other four (or four-and-a-bit) tales, and toappropriate the technical term fabliau to apply to the latter group. The term is often used broadly for all comic tales oflow life invoMng trickery, but there is much advantage in restricting it, in discussing Chaucer, to the tales involving marriage and sex, and setting aside the Friar's and Sum moner's tales for later discussion. The four tales remaining are capable of quite strict definition as fabliaux, as tales, that is, in which a bourgeois husband is duped or tricked into conniving at the free award of his wife's sexual favours to a clever young man. Such tales are widespread in Euro-pean tradition, and well known from being included in such numbers in Boccaccio's Decameron or in French collections such as the Cent Nouvelles Nouvelles ('A Hundred New Stories'). There are very few examples in English: indeed, Chaucer's are almost the only examples of the genre as more strictly defined. It was long believed, because of a convenient assumption about social class and social morality, that the fabliaux could only have been enjoyed by the lower classes, or the bour8eoisie at best,but this belief has been shown to be unfounded,and indeed it seems on the face of it unlikely, given that the pillars of petit-bourgeois society ar。constantly the objects of ridicule, and that the humour of the stories often relies on quite a subtle understanding of the courtly behaviour that istravestied. ……
圖書封面
圖書標(biāo)簽Tags
無
評(píng)論、評(píng)分、閱讀與下載