語言轉(zhuǎn)喻的認(rèn)知闡釋

內(nèi)容概要

本書的精華應(yīng)該是從轉(zhuǎn)喻的角度來研究“句式語法”現(xiàn)象我們知道，自G.Frege提出語言組構(gòu)原則以來，似乎語言的構(gòu)造過程就是一加一等于二。其實不然。當(dāng)代句式語法認(rèn)為，假如一句話內(nèi)在五個詞語，按組構(gòu)原則的說法，運用這五個詞構(gòu)成的語句的語義理所當(dāng)然地應(yīng)該是這五個詞的意義加上它們彼此之間的語法意義的總和。然而按照句式語法的觀點，除了這兩方面外，這五個詞語的安排順序不有特定的句式意義，即傳統(tǒng)語法所說的句型意義。當(dāng)句型意義與語句內(nèi)部的關(guān)鍵詞語的意義在交際上發(fā)生沖突時，就會產(chǎn)生某種形式上的調(diào)整，而這種調(diào)整是通過所謂的“壓制”來完成的傳統(tǒng)語法并未考慮到這一點，而當(dāng)代句式語法考慮到了，從而增加了語法研究的細度。    本書用“腳本”的概念分析了宏觀言語行為的操作狀態(tài)。傳統(tǒng)的言語行為分直接和間接兩種，但總嫌零散、欠系統(tǒng)性和復(fù)疊太多，即所分出的類別這間的界線并不十分清楚，一類中的部分言語行為可以出現(xiàn)在另一類中，等等。

書籍目錄

序前言Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Historical Preamble 1.2 Metonymy in Classical Rhetoric 1.3 Current Interests in Metonymy 1.4 The Framework of the Current StudyChapter 2 Metonymy: From the Perspective of Structualism and Pragmatics 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Previous Pragmatic Accounts of Metonymy 2.3 Structuralist View onMetonymy 2.4 Grice's Theory of Implicature 2.5 Some Problems for Gricean Aproach to Metonymy 2.6 Relevance-theoretic Account of Metonymy 2.7 SummaryChapter 3 Metonymy and Thought 3.1 Introduction 3.2 The Definition of Metonymy 3.3 Metaphor and Metonymy 3.4 Metonymy and Thought 3.5 The Operational Mechanism of Metonymy 3.6 SummaryChapter 4 Metonymy:from the Perspective of Cognition 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Metonymy is a Conceptual Phenomenon 4.3 Metonymy is a Cognitive Process 4.4 Metonymy Operates within the Same Idealized Cognitive Model 4.5 ICM and Metonymy's Generation and Understanding 4.6 Classifications of Metonymies 4.7 SummaryChapter 5 Metonymy's Impact on Linguistic StructureChapter 6 Speech Act Metonymy and Pragematic InferencingChapter 7 cONCLUSIONBibliographyAcknowledgements

圖書封面

圖書標(biāo)簽Tags

無

評論、評分、閱讀與下載

---

    語言轉(zhuǎn)喻的認(rèn)知闡釋 PDF格式下載

---