國(guó)際法

內(nèi)容概要

　　《國(guó)際法（英文版）（第2版）》編選的案例具有很強(qiáng)的多樣性。首先案件的裁決機(jī)構(gòu)十分廣泛：本書(shū)收集了多個(gè)國(guó)際性司法機(jī)構(gòu)的案例，諸如國(guó)際法院、國(guó)際常設(shè)仲裁法院、歐洲人權(quán)法院、海洋法法庭、審判前南斯拉夫戰(zhàn)犯刑事法庭和臨時(shí)仲裁庭裁決的案例。編者希望在向讀者介紹案例的同時(shí)，也讓讀者有機(jī)會(huì)了解這些解決糾紛的國(guó)際機(jī)構(gòu)，了解這些機(jī)構(gòu)為和平解決國(guó)際爭(zhēng)端、維護(hù)國(guó)際法和正義所作的貢獻(xiàn)。

書(shū)籍目錄

第一章 國(guó)際法上的國(guó)家
案例1 Accordance of International Law of the Unilateral Declaration
of Independence of Kosovo
第二章 國(guó)家主權(quán)豁免
案例2 Russell Jackson, et a1.V.The People's Republic of China
第三章 國(guó)際法上的個(gè)人
一、外交保護(hù)
案例3 Nottebohm Case
二、庇護(hù)
案例4 Asylum Case
第四章 國(guó)際人權(quán)法
一、國(guó)家的侵權(quán)行為
案例5 Dolly M.E.Filartiga and Joel Filartiga Americo Norberto
Pena-Irala
二、安樂(lè)死
案例6 Pretty V．the United Kingdom
第五章 國(guó)家領(lǐng)土
案例7 Case Conceming the Temple of Preah Vihear
第六章 海洋法
一、海上劃界
案例8 Eritrea-Yemen Maritime Delimitation
二、用于國(guó)際通行的海峽
案例9 Corfu Channel Case
三、海洋生物資源的保護(hù)
案例10 Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases
第七章 空間法
案例1 1 Case Concerning Questions oflnterpretation and Application of
the 1971 Montreal Convention arising from the Aerial Incident at
Lockerbie
第八章 外交和領(lǐng)事關(guān)系法
一、使館的不可侵犯
案例12 The United States of America and The Federal Reserve Bank of
New York V. The Islamic Republic of Iran and Bank Markazi
Iran
二、領(lǐng)事通知權(quán)
案例13 LaGrand Case
第九章 國(guó)際環(huán)境法
一、國(guó)家管轄和控制下的行為不得對(duì)另一國(guó)家或國(guó)家管轄范圍以外地區(qū)的環(huán)境造成嚴(yán)重?fù)p害
案例14 Trail Smelter Case
二、界水的利用
案例15 Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Umgualy
第十章 條約法
案例1 6 Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project
第十一章 國(guó)際法院
一、管轄權(quán)
案例17 Case Concerning Legality of Use of Force
二、請(qǐng)求法院指示臨時(shí)措施
案例18 LaGrand Case
三、判決的解釋
案例19 Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 11 June 1 998 in
the Case Conceming the Land
……
第十二章 使用武力
第十三章 國(guó)際刑法
資料主要來(lái)源

章節(jié)摘錄

版權(quán)頁(yè)：   In Venezolana the district court had relied,as plaintiffs do,upon thelanguage of the Act's preamble in 1602,which states that "henceforth" casesshould be decided in accordance with the principles of the FSIA.The circuitcourt rejected this,reading the language to mean only that decisions madehenceforth should be governed by the substantive principles of immunity lawadopted in the Act,and holding that the preamble did not purport to sayanything about the retroactive application of the subject matter jurisdictionprovisions in 1330.Moreover,the court specifically recognized a"Congressional mandate to leave intact the status quo ante January 24,1977as respects rights of the parties." 629 E2d at 790. See also Martropico Compania Naviera S.A.v.Perusahaan [etc.],428ESupp.1035,1037(S.D.N.Y.1977):"It seems clear that regardless of theeffect of the Immunities Act on the removal of pending state actions,theoriginal jurisdiction of the federal courts is prospective only." In Venezolana the Second Circuit distinguished Yessenin-Volpin v.Novosti Press Agency,443 ESupp.849(S.D.N.Y.1978)on the ground that ithad applied substantive principles of immunity embodied in 1605 to a casefiled before the effective date of the FSIA and had not addressed thejurisdiction-conferring aspects of the Act.It distinguished other cases thathave addressed the 1330 jurisdiction-creating section in the context ofremoval statutes,which are construed strictly and involve the necessity ofgiving weight to the extent to which the action has progressed in the courtwhere it was initially brought,Martropico,supra,or in the context in whichthe presence of a grant of interim relief,such as attachment in rem,broughtinto play the congressional mandate to not interfere with the rights of partiespre-January 24,1977,e.g.,Amoco Overseas Oil Co.v.Com.Nat.Algeriennede Navigation,459 F.Supp.1242(S.D.N.Y.1978),aff'd 605 F.2d 648(2dCir.1979).

編輯推薦

《國(guó)際法(第2版)》是為了促進(jìn)國(guó)際法的英文教學(xué)而編選的。國(guó)際法最早起源于歐洲，英文和法文一直是學(xué)習(xí)國(guó)際法的重要甚至不可缺少的工具。閱讀英文案例，對(duì)于理解國(guó)際法和在實(shí)踐中適用國(guó)際法都有很大幫助。

圖書(shū)封面

評(píng)論、評(píng)分、閱讀與下載

---

    國(guó)際法 PDF格式下載

---