尋找心靈的家園

內(nèi)容概要

　　《當(dāng)代人文學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)文庫(kù)·尋找心靈的家園：陳染和譚恩美小說(shuō)比較研究》旨在從比較文學(xué)和文化研究的角度探討中國(guó)當(dāng)代女性作家陳染和華裔美國(guó)女性作家譚恩美小說(shuō)中所體現(xiàn)出的女性自我意識(shí)的迷失和重構(gòu)。陳染和譚恩美盡管身處不同的社會(huì)文化語(yǔ)境，但兩人的創(chuàng)作均源自女性內(nèi)心的獨(dú)特感受，以個(gè)人言說(shuō)的方式，關(guān)注女性在特殊的家庭背景和強(qiáng)大的父權(quán)話語(yǔ)影響下的心靈成長(zhǎng)歷程。
　　除緒論和結(jié)語(yǔ)外，《當(dāng)代人文學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)文庫(kù)·尋找心靈的家園：陳染和譚恩美小說(shuō)比較研究》共分六章。緒論回顧了陳染和譚恩美的個(gè)人經(jīng)歷和創(chuàng)作階段，并對(duì)兩者的可比性進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的闡釋。第一章為文本研究的鋪墊，介紹了《當(dāng)代人文學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)文庫(kù)·尋找心靈的家園：陳染和譚恩美小說(shuō)比較研究》的研究問(wèn)題和選材依據(jù)，并討論了本書涉及的研究方法和核心概念，包括新批評(píng)理論、身份認(rèn)同理論、女性主義各階段特征及其后現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)向。作者還對(duì)關(guān)于兩位作家的文獻(xiàn)研究進(jìn)行了細(xì)致的梳理和分析，以突出本書的切入點(diǎn)和研究意義。第二章至第四章分別結(jié)合后現(xiàn)代女性主義理論、心理分析和身份認(rèn)同理論對(duì)陳染和譚恩美小說(shuō)中所表現(xiàn)出的母女關(guān)系、兩性關(guān)系和女性情誼進(jìn)行了文本細(xì)讀式的比較研究。在橫向比較的同時(shí)，作者在每章第一部分又縱向梳理了每一主題在中美文學(xué)傳統(tǒng)中的表現(xiàn)及演變，并結(jié)合當(dāng)時(shí)的社會(huì)歷史環(huán)境詳細(xì)分析了主題演變的原因，以期對(duì)陳染和譚恩美作品的共性、差異及意義進(jìn)行更深入的探討。
　　在前三章主題對(duì)比的基礎(chǔ)上，本書第五章重點(diǎn)分析了兩位作家作品中的文體學(xué)特征。通過(guò)挖掘主人公的夢(mèng)境、幻覺(jué)以及小說(shuō)中關(guān)于鏡子和鳥(niǎo)的意象隱喻，可以看出陳染和譚恩美在創(chuàng)作中滲透的女性主體性的覺(jué)醒和潛意識(shí)下對(duì)女性身份危機(jī)的憂慮。
　　本書最后一章旨在從作家寫作策略的角度回顧陳染和譚恩美在主題和意象賦碼中體現(xiàn)的異同之處。筆者從文化研究的立場(chǎng)出發(fā)，詳細(xì)解讀了陳染的“個(gè)人化寫作”和“超性別意識(shí)”以及譚恩美“講故事”的敘事策略和對(duì)母性譜系的追尋。兩位作家在特定的社會(huì)文化語(yǔ)境下所采取的差異化的寫作策略從某種程度上解釋了兩人在主題表現(xiàn)和意象隱喻上的不同側(cè)重。在重拾女性身份意識(shí)的過(guò)程中，陳染和譚恩美分別選擇了從女性情誼和母女紐帶中汲取精神力量，但兩者又不謀而合地采取了“個(gè)人敘事”的寫作策略。無(wú)論是陳染筆下現(xiàn)代女性的身體體驗(yàn)和生存之痛，還是譚恩美作品中華裔移民幾代母女的艱辛歷程，都寄托了作家對(duì)精神獨(dú)立、自由平等的人類理想的向往。本章還從后現(xiàn)代女性主義的視角考察了陳染和譚恩美作品中共同體現(xiàn)的女性主義意識(shí)。陳染對(duì)女性身體的審美再現(xiàn)及其“超性別意識(shí)”對(duì)性別范疇的解構(gòu)與西蘇“身體寫作”和巴特勒“性別表演”的思想異曲同工，而譚恩美為了重建斷裂的母性譜系而使用的多元交叉式的敘事技巧與伊利格瑞關(guān)于“女性譜系”和克里斯蒂娃對(duì)母性理論的論述不無(wú)相似之處。
　　在這場(chǎng)跨越時(shí)空的對(duì)話中，陳染和譚恩美以各自精湛的筆觸向讀者展示了女性心靈的尋根之旅和對(duì)心靈家園的不懈追求。

作者簡(jiǎn)介

　　和靜，北京外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)英語(yǔ)學(xué)院教師，博士?，F(xiàn)任該校MTI項(xiàng)目主任，翻譯研究中心副主任，中國(guó)跨文化交際學(xué)會(huì)和國(guó)際跨文化交際學(xué)會(huì)會(huì)員。主要研究方向?yàn)楸容^文學(xué)和翻譯理論與實(shí)踐。2005年赴法國(guó)擔(dān)任聯(lián)合國(guó)教科文組織執(zhí)委會(huì)和大會(huì)同傳譯員；2010-2011年赴美國(guó)路易維爾大學(xué)訪學(xué)；累計(jì)為百余場(chǎng)國(guó)際會(huì)議提供了高質(zhì)量的同聲傳譯服務(wù)。出版有《大學(xué)英語(yǔ)快速閱讀》、《英語(yǔ)翻譯三級(jí)陽(yáng)譯》、《十里店：一個(gè)中國(guó)農(nóng)村的革命》等教材和譯著，并在國(guó)內(nèi)外期刊和文集中發(fā)表論文十余篇。

書籍目錄

INTRODUCTION
A. Chen Ran and Amy Tan-A Biographical Sketch
B. Rationale for a Comparison between Chen Ran and Amy Tan
C. Organization of the Book
CHAPTERISETTING THE SCENE AND A LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Research Questions and Selection of Materials
B. Research Methodologies
C. Previous Scholarship on Chen Ran and Amy Tan
CHAPTERII MOTHER-DAUGHTERRELATIONSHIP-FROM REBELLION TO
RECONCILIATION
A. Representations of the Mother in Contemporary Westem and Chinese
Narratives
B. A Thematic Comparison on Mother-Daughter Relationship
CHAPTERIII HETEROSEXUALRELATIONSHIP-FROM ATTACHMENT TO
BANISHMENT
A. Awakening Identity in Westem and Chinese Female Literary
Tradition
B. A Thematic Comparison on Heterosexual Relationship
CHAPTERIV SISTERHOOD-FROM CONSOLATION TO SALVATION
A. Sisterhood Is Powerful
B. A Thematic Comparison on Sisterhood
C. Acceptance of Sisterhood: A Cross-Cultural Comparison
CHAPTER V A COMPARISON OF METAPHORICALIMAGERIES
A. Dreams, Illusions and Women's Identity Crisis
B. The Mirror and Women's Self-Recognition
C. Birds and Women's Dream of lndependence
CHAPTER VIWRITING STRATEGIES OF CHEN RAN AND AMY TAN
A. Chen Ran's Personalized Writing and Gender-Transcendent
Consciousness
B. Amy Tan-Talk Story and Matrilineal Reconstruction
C. Divergent Strategies, Same Pursuit
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

章節(jié)摘錄

　　According to Hirsch， "the impetus to return to a pre-oedipal， pre-verbal moment of origin" through mother-daughter bonding is meant to "provide an instrument for binding the fragments of self，" and serves as the foundation for "a definition of genderdifference" and a framing structure of subject formation that displaces fathers and other male figures from the "feminist family romance" （130）. Such a view is supported bypsychoanalytic feminists such as Nancy Chodorow， Luce Irigaray， Julia Kristeva and Helene Cixous from the postmodern school of thought.　　For Chodorow， American feminist sociologist and psychoanalytic， female identity is not based on the oedipal expulsion of the mother， but on the pre-oedipalidentification with the mother: "The character of the infant's early relation to its moth erprofoundly affects its sense of self， its later object-relationships， and its feelings about its mother and about women in general" （Chodorow 77）. According to Chodorow， the role identification of a girl is determined by her on-going attachment to her mother as the primary caretaker. Different from a boy who is supposed to "detach hisheterosexual orientation from his mother" and identify himself with the father out of the fear for castration so as to resolve the Oedipus complex， a girl's "relationship of dependence， attachment， and symbiosis to her mother continues" as she enters into the Oedipus stage （129）. Although according to psychoanalysts an oedipal girl "oscillates between attachment" to both of her parents， given the "normal situation of parenting"and personality composition， fathers cannot match mothers as "emotionally exclusiveoedipal object" for girls （ibid.）. In other words， women's "closeness to the mother" instead of their "shift of allegiance to the father" defines their development process in culture （Hirsch 132）. As Chodorow claims， "the mother is very important in the daughter's psyche and sense of self， such that core psychological and in terpersonal experiences for women can be understood in terms of this internal mother-daughterlineage" （Chodorow viii）.　　……

圖書封面

評(píng)論、評(píng)分、閱讀與下載

---

    尋找心靈的家園 PDF格式下載

---