英語十年真題·點石成金

內(nèi)容概要

　　本書囊括了同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試2003-2012年十年真題，并對答案進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)解析。在體例及解析形式上進(jìn)行了調(diào)整和補充，使解析部分結(jié)構(gòu)更加清晰易懂，突出考試的重點和難點，幫助考生更好地掌握該學(xué)科的考試特點和學(xué)習(xí)方法，順利通過考試。

作者簡介

　　曹其軍：北京大學(xué)英語教授，全國著名考試輔導(dǎo)專家。授課風(fēng)趣生動，注重技巧，處處切中考試的重點、難點。對同等學(xué)力英語考試命題思路、評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、應(yīng)試技巧等核心問題了如指掌。
王蕙：中國青年政治學(xué)院杰出的青年教師，英語語言學(xué)碩士，學(xué)苑教育資深英語輔導(dǎo)名師，京城著名在職英語“王牌組合”的“二王”之一。著有多部在職英語教科書及輔導(dǎo)用書。
王建華：中國人民大學(xué)外語學(xué)院杰出的青年教師，語言測試認(rèn)知學(xué)博士，學(xué)苑教育資深著名英語輔導(dǎo)專家，京城著名在職英語“王牌組合”的“二王”之一。主編多部在職聯(lián)考英語、同等學(xué)力英語及考研英語輔導(dǎo)書。

書籍目錄

2003年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試
2003年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試試題解析
2004年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試
2004年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試試題解析
2005年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試
2005年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試試題解析
2006年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試
2006年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試試題解析
2007年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試
2007年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試試題解析
2008年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試
2008年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試試題解析
2009年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試
2009年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試試題解析
2010年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試
2010年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試試題解析
2011年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試
2011年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試試題解析
2012年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試
2012年同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位英語水平全國統(tǒng)一考試試題解析

章節(jié)摘錄

　　Passage Four　　The average number of authors on scientific papers is sky-rocketing. That's partly because labs are bigger， problems are more complicated， and more different subspecialties are needed. But it's also because US government agencies have started to promote "team science". As physics developed in the post-World War II era， federal funds built expensive national facilities， and these served as surfaces on which collaborations could crystallize naturally.　　Yet multiple authorship-however good it maybe in other ways-presents problems for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals， long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper.　If there is research misconduct， how should the liability be allocated among the authors? If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others， how should an evaluator aim his or her review?　　Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide， and the joumal should then publish， an account of that author's particular contribution to the work.　But a diff'erent view of the problem， and perhaps of the solution， comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions， which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road.　Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names， agonize over whether a much cited paper was really the candidate's work or a coauthor's， and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility.　　Problems of this kind change the argument， supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles.　After all， if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions， then the judges better know what they did.　But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole， whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field， a team is a team， and the members should share the credit or the blame.　　51. According to the passage， there is a tendency that scientific papers'_　　A. are getting more complicated　　B. are dealing with bigger problems　　C. are more of a product of team work　　D. are focusing more on natural than on social sciences　　52. One of the problems with multiple authorship is that it is hard　　A. to allocate the responsibility if the paper goes wrong　　B. to decide on how much contribution each reviewer has made　　C. to assign the roles that the different authors are to play　　D. to correspond with the authors when the readers feel the need to　　53. According to the passage， authorship is important when _　　A. practical or impractical suggestions of the authors are considered　　B. appointments and promotions of the authors are involved　　……

編輯推薦

　　《同等學(xué)力人員申請碩士學(xué)位全國統(tǒng)一考試輔導(dǎo)叢書：英語（十年真題·點石成金）（2003-2012）（最新版）》具有：緊扣最新大綱，精解十年真題；透視命題趨勢，掌握命題規(guī)律；把握考試脈搏，提高應(yīng)試能力等特點。

圖書封面

評論、評分、閱讀與下載

---

    英語十年真題·點石成金 PDF格式下載

---