明達(dá)語言維度觀及其哲學(xué)關(guān)照

內(nèi)容概要

　　《明達(dá)語言維度觀及其哲學(xué)關(guān)照》在哲學(xué)和語言學(xué)對(duì)明達(dá)語言研究的基礎(chǔ)上提出了明達(dá)語言維度觀，認(rèn)為明達(dá)語言是語言、言語和心智的一個(gè)不可分的維度。在論證明達(dá)語言維度觀的同時(shí)，作者討論了兩個(gè)重要的哲學(xué)論題：語言與心智（mind）的關(guān)系；語言的不完備性。最后，作者用自己提出的明達(dá)語言維度觀來考察另一個(gè)重要的語言哲學(xué)論題：語言和實(shí)在的關(guān)系。《明達(dá)語言維度觀及其哲學(xué)關(guān)照》理論價(jià)值和哲學(xué)意義在于提出并論證了明達(dá)語言維度觀，并對(duì)三個(gè)重要的語言哲學(xué)論題——語言與心智的關(guān)系、語言與實(shí)在的關(guān)系、語言的不完備性——提出了自己新的理論和分析視角。

作者簡介

　　王愛華，重慶忠縣人，四川成都電子科技大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院副教授，中西語言哲學(xué)研究會(huì)理事、會(huì)員，英語語言文學(xué)碩士研究生導(dǎo)師。1999年獲西南師范大學(xué)英語語言文學(xué)碩士學(xué)位；2007年獲廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)外國語言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)博士學(xué)位。2008年—2009年在美國加州大學(xué)伯克利分校訪學(xué)。主要研究方向?yàn)檎Z言哲學(xué)、理論語言學(xué)、語用學(xué)、心智哲學(xué)。在《外語教學(xué)與研究》《外語學(xué)刊》等雜志發(fā)表文章名篇。

書籍目錄

中文導(dǎo)論Chapter 1 Introduction1．1 Introductory remarks1．2 The object of this study1．2．1 The etymology of ML1．2．2 The language system1．2．3 The incompleteness of the previous definitions of ML1．2．4 The definition of ML for this study1．2．5 The notions of OL and metalinguality1．2．6 Some examples of ML phenomena1．3 Rationale for the study1．4 Objectives of this study1．5 Some methodological preliminaries1．6 The organization of the dissertationChapter 2 Previous approaches to ML2．1 The philosophical approach2．1．1 The reflexivity of language2．1．2 The didymous relation between ML and OL2．2 The linguistic approach2．2．1 The pervasiveness of ML in language2.2.2　Metalinguistic consciousness2.2.3　ML's functioning2.3　Comments on the previous approaches to ML2.3.1　 Contributions2.3.2　Limitations and inspirations2.4　SummaryChapter 3　The dimension view of ML3.1　Introduction3.2　The most basic requirement of metalinguality3.2.1　Russell's view on linguistic reflexivity3.2.2　The most basic requirement of metalingua！ity3.3　Metalinguality in language3.3.1　Metalinguality in linguistic sounds3.3.2　Metalinguality in syntax3.3.3　Metalinguality in words3.3.4　The metalinguistic power embedded in a linguistic sign3.3.5　Summary3.4　Metalinguality in speech3.4.1 ML use as a dynamic process of metalinguistic operation3.4.2 ML use displaying an explicit/implicit scale3.4.3 ML use occurring in all language use3.4.4 Summary3.5　Conclusion： language and speech anchored in metalinguality3.5.1　Summary3.5.2　Philosophical implicationsChapter 4　Another argument for metalinguality inspeech： ML's rescuing language from itsimperfection4. 1　Language imperfection4. 1.1　 Incapacity of language4. 1.2　Fallacies， errors and indeterminacy in language4. 2　The philosophers' rescue of language from its imperfection4. 2. 1　Rescuing imperfect language by Locke4. 2.2　Rescuing imperfect language by analytic philosophers4.3　ML and self-rescue of language4. 3.1　 ML as rescuing devices and the Hegelian dialectic4. 3.2　ML rescuing the linearity and one-dimension of language4. 3.3　ML rescuing the discreteness and contractedness of language4. 3.4　ML rescuing the finiteness of language4. 3， 5　ML rescuing the indeterminacy of language4. 3. 6　ML rescuing the fallacies and errors in language4.4　Conclusion： both metalinguality and remediablelanguage imperfection as necessary dimensions oflanguage4. 4. 1　 Summary and conclusion4. 4. 2　Philosophical implicationsChapter 5　Metalinguality in human mind5.1　The notion of mind5.2　The controversial issue about mind and language5.2. 1　The identity view5.2. 2　The separability view5.2. 3　The inseparability view5.2.4　Conclusion5.3　Human mind is linguistic （1） ： biological arguments5.4　Human mind is linguistic （2） ： metaphysical arguments5.5　Do human beings think in mentalese or natural language？5.6　Metalinguistic link between mentalese and NL5.6.1　 Approximation between mentalese and NL5.6.2　Metalinguality linking mentalese and NL5.7　How human mind works： metalinguistic operations on NL5.7. 1　The workplace hypothesis5.7.2　The active-symbol hypothesis5.7.3　The active-passive-symbol hypothesis5.7.4　Summary5.8　Conclusion5.8. 1　Metalinguality of human mind5.8.2　Philosophical implicationsChapter 6　ML and reality6. 1　The notion of reality6. 2　ML dimension empowering language to be constructive6. 2. 1　 What is constructivism？6. 2. 2　The constructive power of ML dimension6.3　ML and constructive reality6. 3. 1　Cookie-cutter reality by global ML6. 3.2　Mangrove-effect reality6. 3.3　Constructive realities accumulated by local ML6. 3.4　The thing-in-itself， dimensions of reality and constructive reality6.4　Conclusion and philosophical implications6.4. 1　 Conclusion6.4. 2　Philosophical implications of the relationship between languageand realityChapter 7　Conclusion7.1　Contributions of the study7.2　Theoretical and philosophical implications of the study7.3　Limitations of the study and suggestions for future workBibliography

圖書封面

評(píng)論、評(píng)分、閱讀與下載

---

    明達(dá)語言維度觀及其哲學(xué)關(guān)照 PDF格式下載

---