710分最新題型快突破

內(nèi)容概要

本試卷特色：    一、題型、題量與真題完全吻合，試卷高度仿真    本試卷完全依據(jù)《全國大學(xué)英語四、六級考試改革方案》精神以及大學(xué)英語六級考試最新題型結(jié)構(gòu)而設(shè)計。參與本試卷編寫的人員都是具有多年一線教學(xué)以及考試輔導(dǎo)經(jīng)驗的專家和教授。他們洞悉四、六級考試的改革方向及命題規(guī)律，在悉心研究最新全真試題的基礎(chǔ)上，精心推敲和設(shè)計了本試卷。本試卷共設(shè)計10套全真模擬試卷。每套試題都具有相應(yīng)的區(qū)分度，其難度和考點的覆蓋面與實考真題及樣卷相吻合，具有較高的信度和效度。考生可通過最新題型的實戰(zhàn)模擬訓(xùn)練掌握最新考試的方向和重點。    二、權(quán)威講解，透徹分析，詳盡釋義    本試卷的模擬試題后配有詳細(xì)的答案解析，并明確標(biāo)出試題類型和解題題眼，便于考生把握出題方向，從而順利通過考試。各題型編寫特色如下：    聽力內(nèi)容-英漢對譯，畫重點線，指出題眼：在聽力的題材選用上，除一般的記敘文、說明文、議論文外，還選用了大量的對話、講座等更具實用性的材料，內(nèi)容包括衣食住行、工作、學(xué)習(xí)等諸多方面。同時，在聽力的錄音上，全部聽力內(nèi)容由資深的外籍專家朗讀，每一套聽力題都有準(zhǔn)確的聽力要求和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的朗讀語速。因此，考生不必?fù)?dān)心像以往一樣在書海中購買的聽力試題無法達(dá)到測試和訓(xùn)練的目的。    快速閱讀、仔細(xì)閱讀和完型填空－“參考譯文”、“文章大意”與詳細(xì)的答案注釋：此三部分的注釋充分考慮了每一個考生的個體情況。即每一套試卷中的每一部分都有詳細(xì)的注釋，以適應(yīng)不同層次的考生需求。如：基礎(chǔ)比較差的考生可以參照“譯文”和詳細(xì)的注解來達(dá)到解惑之效果；基礎(chǔ)好的考生只需查閱注釋即可。編者在每一套試題中的相關(guān)部分都配有參考譯文，并且對所有試題的解題思路都用明顯的下劃線做提示，指出解題題眼，旨在幫助考生理解試題，提高應(yīng)試能力，掌握答題方法。

書籍目錄

Model Test OneModel Test TwoModel Test ThreeModel Test FourModel Test FiveModel Test SixModel Test SevenModel Test EightModel Test NineModel Test Ten

章節(jié)摘錄

　　Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled Do Libraries Become Useless at the Age of Information. You should write at least 150 words following the outline given below.　　1.有人認(rèn)為信息時代不再需要傳統(tǒng)圖書館了，因為……　　2.有人認(rèn)為信息時代傳統(tǒng)圖書館仍然重要作用。因為……　　3.我的看法……　　Directions:In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1.　　For question 1-4, mark　　Y (for YES)　if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage；　　N (for NO) if the statement contradicts the information given in the passage；　　NG　(for NOT GIVEN) if the information is not given in the passage.　　For questions 5-10, complete the sentences with the information given in the passage.　　How Young Is Too Young？　　In theory at least, kids deserve a second chance. In practice, fewer and fewer children may be getting one.　　According to California lawmaker George House and other sponsors of new get-tough measures, kids arrested for crimes no longer deserve special treatment. They no longer deserve anonymity.　　With juvenile crime on the rise-and with it, citizen anxiety over youthful lawiessness－h(huán)olding youngsters not only legally, but publicly, accountable for their actions is a popular national trend.　　According to the National Center for Juvenile Justice, which tracks juvenile crimes as well as laws for　　dealing with them, the juvenile codes in 29 states now allow the names and sometimes the pictures of juve-　　niles to be released to the public. In some cases, laws go so far as to require that the media be told the ames of juveniles.　　Since January 1995, California news organizations have had free access to the names of juveniles as young as 14 who are charged with serious crimes. Such new policies are placing newspapers and broadcasters in the uneasy role of gatekeeper, forcing them to reevaluate the medias traditional taboo on publishing minor defendants names.　　Although most newspapers are holding fast to old habits of printing only the names of juveniles who are tried as adults, all are under pressure to remove the cloak of anonymity from a new generation of so called super predators——to quit protecting the privacy of kids who are being labeled “sociopaths”even before they enter high school.　　“It turns my stomach whenever I read the line in the paper； the teenager s name is being withheld because he is a juvenile,” a reader recently wrote to a Florida newspaper. “There are too many so-calied juveniles giving birth, stealing, murdering, etc. to save their faces or names with this stupid law.”　　In Pennsylvania, juvenile confidentiality became a key issue in the 1994 governor s race, when a woman who was raped by a 15-year-old went on television to complain that the unnamed boy would not rate such protection if voters elected her candidate to the statehouse.　　In Orange County, two daily newspapers were in conflict publicly over how to cover the story of a 14year-old s arrest in the killing of his mother in March. While the Orange County edition of the Los Angeles Times named the young suspect, the competing Orange County Register did not. But days later, the om budsman for the Register told his readers that The Times was right, noting that the Register went a long way toward identifying the boy by naming his mother and his father.　　The Times, like most major metropolitan newspaperS, has no set policy for naming juveniles and decides each case on its individual merits.　　Under a proposed legislative package, supported by Atty. Gen. Dan Lungren to “reintroduce shame,”police would release the names of any juvenile arrested for serious felonies ( 重罪 ), including burglary,rape and murder——as well as for graffiti (亂涂亂畫), which Lungren calls “urban terrorism”.　　The controversy over whether to use the new access to juveniles names has reached into many newsrooms, igniting emotional debates over the old question of whether protecting childrens identities helps or hurts their chances for rehabilitation.　　“The news-gathering industry is split right down the middle on this issue,” says Nancy Woodhull, executive director of the Freedom Forum Media Studies Center at Columbia University. Secrecy may obscure the juvenile justice systems mistakes. “We always have to ask, by not revealing a youngster s name, are you protecting the child or are you doing the child a disservice？” Woodhull says.“The question comes down to whom we are trying to protect, society or the youngster？ And by shielding troubled kids for so long, have we brought on the problems were now facing？”　　When America s juvenile justice system was created in the late 19th century, it was based on the benevolent belief that“there are no bad children.”In the 1990s, with callous (無情的) murders being attributed to boys and girls still in grade school, such faith in second chances can be difficult to sustain.　　When 5-year-old Eric Morse was dropped by his heels from a 14th-story window by two of the toughest bullies in his South Chicago neighborhood, editors at the Chicago Tribune wrestied with identifying the murder suspects——one 10 years old, the other 11.　　“We decided the best thing to do was to avoid using juvenile names, even in this high-profile horrific case, and even when so many of those around us were naming names,” recalls Deputy Managing Editor James O Shea.　　Recently, the paper used the boys nicknames for an in——depth look at the extraordinary courtor dered rehabilitation plan for Erics young killers, but the Tribune has no plans to fully name the boys in print.　　“We have not regretted that decision,” says O Shea, who believes that psychological profiles of the two boys have shown that perhaps they can still be saved. “At least, its worth trying. Both ofthese kids are fascinating to look at. In many ways, these same kids who d go to Lake Michigan to catch flogs would toss a kid out the window. One of the boys was very kind to animals, collected and cared for stray dogs in his neighborhood.”　　We need to find out whats going on here. Where have kids gone wrong and how can we change that？ That seems to be more important here than the question of pub “hshing names,” O Shea says.　　Saundra Keyes, managing editor of the Miami Herald, refers to the “heinousness threshold” when de scribing her papers policy.“We make our decisions on a case-by-case basis, but if the act is a truly heinous (兇惡的 ) one, we are far more likely to print more details, including names, than not.”　　Such policies, say those who track juvenile crime, may contribute to the growing fear of youthful law lessness. “A lot of statutory changes to identify juveniles and treat them as adults are coming about because of public perceptions that are driven by media reports of only the most violent stuff,” says Melissa Sickmund, senior research associate at the Pittsburgh-based Juvenile Justice Center.　　“There is great confusion still within the system about how to treat juvenile offenders,” Sickmund says. “We recently were asked for advice in a case where a 15-year-old charged with murder in Louisiana wanted to buy cigarettes in jail and was told he was too young. Yet, when it comes to trying him for murder, he is being treated as an adult.”　　Although national statistics show that 1996 of those entering the justice system in 1994 for violent crime were younger than 18, less than one-half of 1% of all the juveniles in the United States were arrested for murder, rape, robbery or aggravated assault that year.　　“No matter how much violence we hear about in the news, ff you look into court, youll see a lot of sorry little kids and only an occasional tough kid,” says Sickmund, who believes the system should operate on the assumption that there is “almost always” hope for rehabilitation.　　To liberate children from the mistakes of their youth, juvenile courts have traditionally expunged juvenile records once they leave the system. The value of that clean slate is inestimable, say some of the high-profile men and women who have benefited from it.　　A well-known federal judge who had served a juvenile sentence for car theft, for example, credits the systems institutional amnesia(健忘癥 )with clearing the way for him to attend Harvard University and be come a lawyer. “I would not have been able to become who I am today without the special protections of the juvenile justice system,”says the judge, who asked to remain anonymous.

編輯推薦

　　《最新六級預(yù)測試卷》題型設(shè)計：依據(jù)710分考試最新六級實考真題編寫，其答題順序、題型比例、試題容量及考試分布均與真題相吻合。難易度設(shè)計：每一套模擬試卷都具有一定的區(qū)分度和靈活性，其題量、難度和考點覆蓋面均與實考真題相接近。聽力特色：試題答案注釋詳盡，每一套試題都有準(zhǔn)確的聽力要求和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的朗讀語速，外籍專家朗讀錄音。　　閱讀特色：試題的每一部分都有詳盡的文章注釋及全文翻譯。

圖書封面

評論、評分、閱讀與下載

---

    710分最新題型快突破 PDF格式下載

---