避免二次傷害

內(nèi)容概要

　　《避免二次傷害：警察訊問言語研究》屬于法律語言學(xué)研究領(lǐng)域，旨在運用語言學(xué)理論和方法分析、解決法律問題。本研究中的“二次傷害”指警察的訊問言語對家庭暴力案件中作為犯罪嫌疑人的受虐女性所造成的言語傷害。基于言語適應(yīng)理論和語言評價理論，本研究建構(gòu)了“多維度言語轉(zhuǎn)變模型”作為研究警察話語的分析框架，從社會、文化和心理維度就警察言語進行話語分析，并得出結(jié)論：“二次傷害”問題可以通過警察訊問模式的變革—從訊問到詢問的言語轉(zhuǎn)變加以避免。

書籍目錄

AcknowledgementsList of Figures and TablesChapter 1 Introduction1.1 Rationale of This Study1.2 Working Definitions1.3 Research Objective1.4 Research Questions1.5 Data and Research Methodology1.5.1 Data Collection and Data Classification1.5.2 Research Methods1.6 Significance of This Study1.7 Organization of This BookChapter 2 Previous Studies of Relevant Topics2.1 Introduction2.2 Studies on Domestic Violence2.2.1 Definitions of Domestic Violence and Violence Against Women2.2.2 Relevant Laws and Regulations2.2.3 Research on DV/VAW2.3 Research on Police Interrogations2.3.1 Interrogation Tactics and Techniques2.3.2 Approach of Forensic Psychology2.3.3 Communication Approach to Policing Domestic Violence.2.3.4 Approach of Forensic Linguistics2.3.5 Legislative Power of Interrogating Suspects by the Police in China2.3.6 Approaches to Language Issues of Police Interrogations in China2.3.7 Related Research on Linguistic Strategies in Courtroom Interaction2.4 Linguistic Theories Relevant to Speech Shifting2.4. l A Survey of the Speech Accommodation Theory2.4.2 SAT in Use2.4.3 An Overview of the SFL and Its Appraisal Theory2.4.4 SFL and Appraisal Theory in Use2.4.5 The Birmingham School of Discourse Analysis2.6 SummaryChapter 3 Theoretical Framework3.1 Introduction3.2 Revisiting the Linguistic Theories Along Three Dimensions3.2.1 Engagement System Realizing Social Variables:Power and Solidarity3.2.2 Accommodation Adapting to Cultural and Psychological Dimensions3.2.3 Language Devices Realizing the Linguistic Strategies3.2.3.1 Lexical Choice and Information Density3.2.3.2 Grammatical Variation and Pragmatic Transmutation……

章節(jié)摘錄

版權(quán)頁：插圖：Methodologically, this research takes an integration of inductiveapproach （bottom-up） and deductive approach （top-down）. It is inductivein that we start from the bottom by focusing on the data: identifyingspecific language devices, for instance, legal terms, imperatives, and IRexchange structure, etc., classifying them into various categories.Meanwhile, it is deductive in that the linguistic strategies originate fromthe top, the theories as mentioned above, which are conducive to theconstruction of the present theoretical framework. Contrastive analysis, though not in its original sense of describing thedifferences of two or more languages in applied linguistics, is alsoemployed in this research to describe the structural （grammatical andlexical） differences of the speech in police interrogations and policeinterviewing. This analysis is intended to reveal the degrees of difficultyand comprehensibility of the police talk when they make different lexical,grammatical and discoursal choices.

編輯推薦

《避免二次傷害:警察訊問言語研究》：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)外國語言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)研究中心(國家重點文科基地)廣東省哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)“十一五”規(guī)劃項目廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)“211工程”三期重點學(xué)科建設(shè)子項目

圖書封面

圖書標(biāo)簽Tags

無

評論、評分、閱讀與下載

---

    避免二次傷害 PDF格式下載

---