傾銷

內(nèi)容概要

　　《傾銷:反傾銷法抑或競爭法(英文)》從歷史淵源出發(fā)，跟隨反傾銷制度的發(fā)展，探究其長久以來“不證自明”之前提的真實(shí)性——“傾銷有害”，在明確其與競爭法的相關(guān)性后，結(jié)合傳統(tǒng)的和新的“重度使用反傾銷者”兩方面實(shí)踐，以比較的方法全面探討將“傾銷”置于競爭法而非反傾銷法之下的優(yōu)勢，同時梳理及剖析反對該取代的主要理由。最終得出：以世界貿(mào)易組織《反傾銷協(xié)議》為基準(zhǔn)的各國反傾銷規(guī)則應(yīng)最終為日益發(fā)展并相互融合的各國競爭規(guī)則以及有關(guān)掠奪性價格歧視的國際統(tǒng)一競爭協(xié)議所取代。為逐步達(dá)到該目標(biāo)，更多的可行性方案應(yīng)自雙邊和區(qū)域展開。

作者簡介

　　畢瑩，浙江大學(xué)光華法學(xué)院講師。2003年獲清華大學(xué)法學(xué)學(xué)士學(xué)位，2006年獲清華大學(xué)國際法學(xué)碩士學(xué)位，2009年獲日本九州大學(xué)國際法學(xué)博士學(xué)位。主要從事國際經(jīng)濟(jì)法的研究，在The
Journal of World
Investment＆Trade.日本《法政研究》等國內(nèi)外公開發(fā)行的學(xué)術(shù)刊物上發(fā)表論文數(shù)篇；主持國家社科基金課題1項(xiàng)：“中曰韓自貿(mào)區(qū)競爭與反傾銷規(guī)則協(xié)調(diào)研究?！?/pre>


書籍目錄
Chapter 1 Time to Reexamine Dumping: Antidumping Law or
Competition Law
　1.1 Overview of Antidumping Law
　　1.1.1 The Etymology of "Dumping"
　　1.1.2 Legislative Development of Antidumping: Domestic to
International
　1.2 The Proliferation of Antidumping laws and Actions
　　1.2.1 The Proliferation of Antidumping laws
　　1.2.2 The Proliferation of Antidumping Actions
　　1.2.3 New Features of Antidumping Application
　1.3 The Problem of Antidumping Law
　　1.3.1 "Protectionist Abuse" Criticism
　　1.3.2 Tariff - Like Barrier
　　1.3.3 "Attractive Features" for Protectionism
　1.4 "Antidotes" to Prevent Protectionist Abuse
　　1.4.1 Further Refining
　　1.4.2 Reform by Competition
　1.5 Antidumping: Time to Go Back to Basics
Chapter 2 Dumping in Economic Theories and Antidumping Law
　2.1 Dumping in Economic Theories
　　2.1.1 The Traditional Dumping Theory of Viner
　　2.1.2 The Modern Dumping Theory of Willig
　　2.1.3 Generally Recognized Harmful Dumping:Predatory
Dumping
　2.2 Dumping in the Original Antidumping Law
　　2.2.1 The U.S.1894 Wilson Act
　　2.2.2 The U.S.1916 Antidumping Law
　　2.2.3 The U.S.1921 Antidumping Law
　　2.2.d Antidumping laws in Other Countries
　　2.2.5 Antidumping: Anti Cross-border Predatory Price
Discrimination
　2.3 Dumping in the International Antidumping Agreement
　　2.3.1 GATT/WTO: Standardizing Antidumping Law
　　2.3.2 Basic Common Requirements on Dumping
　　2.3.3 "Dumping is Harmful" : Self-evident Premise
　2.4 Summary
Chapter 3 Predatory Price Discrimination in Economic Theories and
Competition Law
　3.1 Predatory Price Discrimination in Economic Theories
　　3.1.1 Price Discrimination: Primary-line and Secondary-line
Competition
　　3.1.2 Predatory Pricing
　3.2 Overview of Competition Law
　　3.2.1 Consensus on the Basic Competition Principles
　　3.2.2 Predatory Price Discrimination
　3.3 Predatory Price Discrimination in Competition Law
　　3.3.1 Competition Rules and Cases in the U.S.
　　3.3.2 Competition Rules and Cases in the EU
　　……
Chapter 4 Dumping: Antidumping Law or Competition Law
Chapter 5 Difficulties of Substitution in Practice
Chapter 6 The "Substitution" Debate and the New Users
Chapter 7 Time to Reexamine Dumping: "Trust
Antitrust to Dump Antidumping
Conclusion
Appendix List of Chinese Antidumping Cases （1997-2010）
Bibliography


章節(jié)摘錄
版權(quán)頁：插圖：The debate of antidumping versus competition is a relatively new but very significant issue. Based on all of the above analysises and examinations from both traditional and new heavy users of antidum-ping, this book argues for putting the issue of dumping under compe-tition rules instead of antidumping rules. The domestic antidumping rules and the WTO Antidumping Agreement should be finally substitu-ted by the harmonized domestic competition rules and their basic standard, i. e. the international competition agreement on predatory price discrimination, all around the world in future.The original and supposed goal of antidumping rules should be the same as that of competition rules. In economic theories, efficiency approach favored by most econmists, suggests that dumping is one kind of transnational price discrimination, and only predatory dum-ping is generally recognized as harmful. As to antidumping law, a jour-ney back to its birth time as well as the following evolvement indicate that, originally antidumping was actually part of antitrust law, to deal with the import price discrimination, and it is only for dealing with these foreign conducts more efficiently that antidumping rules were changed and gradually distinctive from antitrust rules. However, nei-ther the change of special rules nor that of legal areas can be the evi-dence to question the original and supposed justification of antidum-ping.




編輯推薦
《傾銷:反傾銷法抑或競爭法(英文)》由知識產(chǎn)權(quán)出版社出版。





圖書封面






評論、評分、閱讀與下載



還沒讀過(90)
勉強(qiáng)可看(652)
一般般(111)
內(nèi)容豐富(4616)
強(qiáng)力推薦(378)


 


    傾銷 PDF格式下載