律師評價語言的社會符號學(xué)研究

內(nèi)容概要

　　本書從社會符號學(xué)視角入手，綜合韓禮德學(xué)派的話語分析模式與哈貝馬斯的主體間性，針對當(dāng)前司法改革中的實踐問題——律師的法庭辯論語言進行語言學(xué)體系構(gòu)建與理論解釋；在理性思辨的基礎(chǔ)上，依托實地采錄的法庭辯論語料庫，有效利用中西話語分析的研究成果，從宏觀到微觀深入分析了律師在辯論中如何發(fā)表評價性意見，揭示了貌似客觀的律師話語中所隱含的主觀性態(tài)度及表現(xiàn)形式，最終論證了律師理性辯論模式的適切性。
　　本書運用語言學(xué)理論來探討法律交際領(lǐng)域中的具體問題，具有跨學(xué)科研究性質(zhì)，涉及語言學(xué)、哲學(xué)、法學(xué)等學(xué)科知識，體現(xiàn)了應(yīng)用語言學(xué)的社會實踐價值，因此不僅對法律語言學(xué)、話語分析、應(yīng)用語言學(xué)等專業(yè)的研究人員與學(xué)生有啟發(fā)意義，對從事司法實踐或研究法學(xué)文化的學(xué)者或?qū)W生也有實踐參考價值，也合適做英語、法律愛好者的閱讀材料。

作者簡介

　　張麗萍，女，生于1973年11月1日，山西和順人，南京理工大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院教師，副教授，碩士生導(dǎo)師，廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)應(yīng)用語言學(xué)博士，法律語言學(xué)方向首批博士生。迄今為止，已發(fā)表各類法律語言學(xué)論文十余篇(其中CSSCl四篇)，參加國際學(xué)術(shù)會議一次，主持或參與省廳／部級科研項目10項，參與校精品課程建設(shè)3項，承擔(dān)或參與校教改項目2項，參與教材編撰2部。

書籍目錄

1　Introduction　
　1.1　Research orientation
　1.2　Working definition
　1.3　Rationale for this study　
　1.4　0bjective and research questions
　　1.4.1　General objective
　　1.4.2　Specific research questions
　1.5　Significance of this study
　1.6　Research methodology and data collection
　　1.6.1　Research methodology
　　1.6.2　Data collection and description
　1.7　0rganization of this book
2　Literature Review　
　2.1　Introduction　
　2.2　The construct of lawyer evaluation
　　2.2.1　The origin of lawyer evaluation
　　2.2.2　The constituents of lawyer evaluation　
　2.3　Lawyer evaluation and context
　2.4　Lawyer evaluation in context：a linguistic perspective
　　2.4.1　Lawyer evaluation identified in discourse
　　2.4.2　Two dimensions for the positioning of lawyer
evaluation
　　2.4.3　Lawyer evaluation on the dimension of solidarity
　2.5　Lawyer evaluation in context：a legal perspective
　　2.5.1　Major issues for lawyer evaluation
　　2.5.2　Predominant legal ideology
　　2.5.3　Habermasian interpretations of judicial communication
　2.6　Summary
　……
3　Theoretical Framework
4　The Constituents of Lawyer Evaluation
5　Lawyer Evaluation under Contextual Constraints
6　Discursive Construction of Rational Lawyer Evaluation
7　Functions of Lawyer Evaluation
8　Conclusion
APPENDICES
REFERENCES

章節(jié)摘錄

版權(quán)頁：插圖：Structurally，lawyer evaluation can be identified and described in terms of an evalu-ator，evaluated and evaluating item.An evaluating item is the locus of an evaluativeattitude.An evaluator is the source of evaluative attitudes.The evaluated iS the ob.ject or entity that evaluative attitudes apply to.The evaluator in this study is specifically made to refer to lawyers.It is realizedin nouns／nominal phrase or related pronouns designating lawyers，clients or parties.However，how lawyers show up in text as sources of evaluative attitudes is a processof selection.Generally，there are two options for the presentation of an evaluator intext.It may be directly presented and identified in clauses，or may be concealed andindirectly identified.In the second case，the evaluator is retrievable in the context.The evaluated is the object or entity an evaluative attitude applies to.Realizedin nouns or nominal phrases，it can be identified on different scales，either locally atthe clause level or globally as part of the macro-topics of lawyer evaluation.Structurally，an evaluating item is the rudimentary element in the identificationof lawyer evaluation.As the locus of evaluative attitudes，it has two different realiza-tions，“congruent expression”and“incongruent expression”.

編輯推薦

《律師評價語言的社會符號學(xué)研究》是由知識產(chǎn)權(quán)出版社出版的。

圖書封面

評論、評分、閱讀與下載

---

    律師評價語言的社會符號學(xué)研究 PDF格式下載

---