語篇對話性的理論及應(yīng)用

內(nèi)容概要

　　從文學(xué)及社會批評理論汲取營養(yǎng)，借助語言學(xué)提供的微觀分析手段，整合出有效的分析框架并用以對非文學(xué)語篇進行批評性讀解，是批評性語篇分析的主流方法。該專著在對巴赫金超語言學(xué)理論進行系統(tǒng)闡述的基礎(chǔ)上，將其置于系統(tǒng)功能語言學(xué)理論視角之下進行重新語境化，提出了一個用于揭示語篇對話性的有效分析框架，并將該框架用于分析書面新聞?wù)Z篇。分析與以虛構(gòu)為主要特征的文學(xué)語篇相對的、以“事實性”與“客觀性”為基本訴求的新聞?wù)Z篇，一來檢驗該分析框架的有效性和探索新聞?wù)Z篇的本質(zhì)特征，二來有助于從語篇層面上探討閱讀的認知機制。

作者簡介

　　李曙光，安徽安慶人。英語語言文學(xué)專業(yè)文學(xué)博士?，F(xiàn)任南京師大外國語學(xué)院副教授、碩士生導(dǎo)師。獲南京師大第八屆青年教師教學(xué)大賽“教學(xué)十佳”稱號。研究方向為篇章語言學(xué)、句法學(xué)。發(fā)表論文十余篇，出版專著1部（第二作者）。代表作有《語篇對話性與英語書面新聞?wù)Z篇分析》、《語篇分析中的互文性與對話性》和《POSS-ing結(jié)構(gòu)的句法分析》?，F(xiàn)主持江蘇高校社會科學(xué)基金項目1項，參與國家社會科學(xué)基金項目2項。

書籍目錄

IntroductionChapter 1 Bakhtin's Translinguistics1.1 Bakhtin's understanding of language1.1.1 Language, sign, consciousness and ideology1.1.2 The object of language-study1.2　Bakhtin's translinguistics1.2.1 Discourse, text and utterance1.2.2 Utterance, context and speech genres1.3 Translinguistics and textual analysis1.3.1Discourse, text and utterance in contemporary linguistics1.3.2 Discourse, text and utterance in our discussion1.3.3 Bakhtin's translinguistics and textual analysis1.4 SummaryChapter 2 The Compatibility between Translinguistics and Hallidayan SFL2.1 Non-Aristotelian philosophical tradition2.2　Translinguistics and SFL: context, function,register　and　genre2.2.1 Context of situation: Bakhtin, Malinowski and　Halliday2.2.2 Linguistic functions: Buhler, Bakhtin and_ Halliday2.2.3 Register and genre: Bakhtin, Halliday and Martin2.3 Instantiation and realization: SFL bridging translinguistics and linguistics2.4 A double-oriented functional model of textual analysis2.4.1A theory-driven top-down dialogic look at text2.4.2 A data-driven bottom-up linguistic look at text2.5 SummaryChapter 3 Modeling Dialogicity on Hallidayan SFL3.1 Bakhtin's idea of textual dialogicity3.1.1 Dialogue, dialogicity and dialogism3.1.2 The mode of dialogicity3.1.3 Problems with Bakhtin's mode of textual dialogicity3.2 Recontextualizing Bakhtinian dialogicity in the context of Hallidayan SFL and the postmodern theories3.2.1From subject and utterance to voice: participant of textual dialogue3.2.2 The dialogic relationship between voices3.2.3 Dialogic markers in the text3.2.4 Functions of dialogic relationships in the text3.3 SummaryChapter 4 Dialogic Markers in Print News of English4.1 Voice, difference, and source in news text4.2 Dialogic markers of speech reporting in news text4.2.1 Speech reporting:a fundamental feature of human language4.2.2 News text: report about others' words4.2.3 Bakhtin's understanding of speech reporting4.2.4 Dialogic markers in speech reporting4.3 Modality as dialogic markers in news text4.3.1　Modality and dialogicity4.3.2 Modality resources as dialogic markers4.4 Conjunction resources as dialogic markers in news text4.5 Negatives as dialogic markers in news text4.6 SummaryChapter 5 Dialogic Interactions in Pdnt News of English5.1 The dialogic relations in print news……

章節(jié)摘錄

　　Language is the greatest source of power because it resides in its organization as a huge network of interrelated paradigmatic choices; the system of language is thus this huge network of choices， theorized as　meaning potential.　　　The complexity of language also lies in the fact that it is a layered system; the relationship between the different layers or strata is theorized as realization，. For instance， meanings are realized as wordings， and wordings realized as sound （ or soundings）The interstratal realization ensures the connection between the top order meaning system and the bot- tom order physical system. Among the strata of systems， the emergence of the stratum of lexicogrammar is crucial not only from a phylogenetic per- spective but also from an on，togenetic one（Halliday， 2002a：　355-60）. [2] It supplies the space in which meanings could be organized in their own terms. At this stratum， the syntagnlatic composition， which forms the ma- jor concern of Saussurean structure， is fundamental.　　And the structure of clause rank is central because it cames the main burden of integrating the various kinds of meanings-that is， the selections in the various meaning systems-into a single frame. Thus， it can be accepted that the clause rank and its compositional structure' provide a point at which Halliday's system dovetails with Saussurean structural linguistics.　But it is necessary to note at this juncture that in Halliday's view， syntagmatic composition is the simplest and most accessible form of organization for any system whether material or semiotic， not just for the syntactic system.

圖書封面

評論、評分、閱讀與下載

---

    語篇對話性的理論及應(yīng)用 PDF格式下載

---