2011年-考研英語真題考點與常見錯誤透析

前言

高教版2011年考研英語系列叢書，由考研英語大綱修訂的專家和全國考研英語輔導(dǎo)團(tuán)隊中的精英教師編寫?？蓾M足2011年考生全過程復(fù)習(xí)備考的需要。本系列教材專門針對全國各地考研輔導(dǎo)班學(xué)生的特點和實際水平編寫，也適合社會考生自學(xué)的需要。書中融合了考研英語輔導(dǎo)專家多年輔導(dǎo)的經(jīng)驗，完全切中考研英語大綱的考點。內(nèi)容闡述準(zhǔn)確、精練，重點突出。而且本書在編寫時吸取了各屆輔導(dǎo)班學(xué)員的意見和建議，對考生來說是一套非常權(quán)威、實用的考試參考書。一、《2011年考研英語真題考點與常見錯誤透析》根據(jù)最新英語考試大綱的要求，總結(jié)了考研英語歷年真題考查的知識點和常見錯誤，包括試題解析、選項解析、考生常見錯誤與防范、試題全文翻譯、重點詞語和長難句分析。本書2010年版獲中國書刊發(fā)行行業(yè)協(xié)會頒發(fā)的“2009年度全行業(yè)優(yōu)秀暢銷書”獎。本書的最大特點是：從解題思路和常見錯誤入手去審視和剖析每一道試題?？忌梢酝ㄟ^這種較高學(xué)術(shù)性的解題方式迅速領(lǐng)悟考試的重點和難點。走出復(fù)習(xí)和解題的盲區(qū)。二、《2011年考研英語（一）寫作突破100題》是根據(jù)最新英語考試大綱的要求，總結(jié)考研英語寫作部分的命題規(guī)律和復(fù)習(xí)思路編寫的。針對考生普遍的實際寫作水平，尤其是廣大考生的三大寫作障礙：（1）不知道英語寫作的具體模式；（2）無法用英語表達(dá)自己的思想；（3）缺乏達(dá)到研究生入學(xué)寫作水平的相應(yīng)能力。本書利用100篇典型的范文使考生認(rèn)識到：英語寫作是什么？寫什么？怎么寫？該書涉及了考綱所要求的寫作模式和內(nèi)容，具有極強的針對性，適合考生在強化和沖刺時使用。三、《2011年考研英語（一）全真沖刺試卷》供考生在沖刺階段使用，其中包括5套全真沖刺試卷。各套試卷根據(jù)考研英語大綱精心編制，具有全面性、典型性、變化性、針對性、技巧性、綜合性等特點，幫助考生在考試來臨之前最后鞏固基礎(chǔ)階段所學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)知識，掌握重點和難點，熟悉解題思路和方法，增強應(yīng)試能力，查漏補缺。四、《新編考研英語讀真題記單詞（2011年版）》使考生在最短的時間內(nèi)了解并掌握考研大綱核心詞匯，全面提升考研復(fù)習(xí)的速度；解決廣大考生目前的一個常見問題：背了許多單詞，可是放到原文中卻不能連詞成句，以至于造成誤解和丟分；在具體語境中記單詞，從而能夠加強記憶，準(zhǔn)確把握詞意，使每個詞學(xué)有所用。

內(nèi)容概要

本書根據(jù)最新英語考試大綱的要求，總結(jié)了考研英語歷年真題考查的知識點和常見錯誤，包括試題解析、選項解析、考生常見錯誤與防范、試題全文翻譯、重點詞語和長難句分析。     該書2010年版獲中國書刊發(fā)行行業(yè)協(xié)會頒發(fā)的“2009年度全行業(yè)優(yōu)秀暢銷書”獎?？忌梢酝ㄟ^這種較高學(xué)術(shù)性的解題方式迅速領(lǐng)悟考試的重點和難點，走出復(fù)習(xí)和解題的盲區(qū)。

書籍目錄

2010年全國碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語(一)試題  考點與常見錯誤透析2009年全國碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語試題  考點與常見錯誤透析2008年全國碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語試題  考點與常見錯誤透析2007年全國碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語試題  考點與常見錯誤透析2006年全國碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語試題  考點與常見錯誤透析2005年全國碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語試題  考點與常見錯誤透析2004年全國碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語試題  考點與常見錯誤透析2003年全國碩士研究生人學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語試題  考點與常見錯誤透析2002年全國碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語試題  考點與常見錯誤透析2001年全國碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語試題  考點與常見錯誤透析

章節(jié)摘錄

插圖：In his book The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell argues that "social epidemics" aredriven in large part by the actions of a tiny minority of special individuals, often called influ-entials, who are unusually informed, persuasive, or well connected. The idea is intuitivelycompelling, but it doesn't explain how ideas actually spread.The supposed importance of influentials derives from a plausible-sounding but largely un-tested theory called the "two-step flow of communication": Information flows from themedia to the influentials and from them to everyone else. Marketers have embraced the two-step flow because it suggests that if they can just fred and influence the influentials, those se-lect people will do most of the work for them. The theory also seems to explain the suddenand unexpected popularity of certain looks, brands, or neighborhoods. In many such cases,a cursory search for causes finds that some small group of people was wearing, promoting,or developing whatever it is before anyone else paid attention. Anecdotal evidence of thiskind fits nicely with the idea that only certain special people can drive trends.In their recent work, however, some researchers have come up with the finding that in-fluentials have far less impact on social epidemics than is generally supposed. In fact, theydon't seem to be required at all.The researchers' argument stems from a simple observation about social influence: Withthe exception of a few celebrities like Oprah Winfrey —— whose outsize presence is primarily afunction of media, not interpersonal, influence —— even the most influential members of apopulation simply don't interact with that many others. Yet it is precisely these non-celebrityinfluentials who, according to the two-step-flow theory, are supposed to drive social epidem-ics, by influencing their friends and colleagues directly. For a social epidemic to occur, how-ever, each person so affected must then influence his or her own acquaintances, who must inturn influence theirs, and so on; and just how many others pay attention to each of thesepeople has little to do with the initial influential. If people in the network just two degrees re-moved from the initial influential prove resistant, for example, the cascade of change won'tpropagate very far or affect many people.Building on the basic truth about interpersonal influence, the researchers studied the dy-namics of social influence by conducting thousands of computer simulations of populations,manipulating a number of variables relating to people's ability to influence others and theirtendency to be influenced. They found that the principal requirement for what is called"global cascades".

編輯推薦

《2011年考研英語真題考點與常見錯誤透析》全國考研輔導(dǎo)班教材系列

圖書封面

評論、評分、閱讀與下載

---

    2011年-考研英語真題考點與常見錯誤透析 PDF格式下載

---